Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 7

Analysis - Essay ExampleBy providing this scenario, he invokes a catch twenty-two typesetters case situation in the mind of his reader and a sense of absurdity. He then further stimulates this sense of the bizarre by stating that in order to vindicate the agent (4), the government must outset attain the name of the origin from the reporter and if the journalist chooses not to provide such information under privilege, the informant may never be caught (8). At this point, Volokh gains the interest of his reader, enough to induce him/her to read further.Having gained the readers attention, Volokh then moves from the hypothetical to reality by introducing the Plame Affair, an incident with which most readers would be familiar and would probably have views on, and a more recent incident in Providence, R.I where a reporter was convicted of criminal contempt (13) for not naming the someone who gave him a tape of a city official accepting a bribe (14). By referring to these actual cases, the reader is more likely to agree with his questions Should in that location be a journalists privilege What should its scope be And who exactly qualifies as a journalist (16/17). In other words, he sets the scene and lays the groundwork first before moving to his real contention.At this point in his article,... nd that states are divided on the issue with some acknowledging a journalists privilege to various degrees, while others and the federal government (27) are not. This inference of authority being in such disarray, and his poignant use of language, such as a mystic three-paragraph concurrence (20), should try to strike a proper balance (23), and the situation is a mess (29), help to stimulate the readers sense of helplessness and vulnerability. Volokh then broadens his crimp of reasoning from discussion on whether there should be a journalists privilege and its scope to who qualifies as a journalist (17), and further expounds the problem by upbringing the issue of the h undreds of thousands (31) of bloggers who write on the internet, some of which come with a condition of confidentiality (32/33). By appealing to the First Amendment once again, he asserts that freedom of the press should hold in to people equally (35) including bloggers. This however, creates another problem, suggests Volokh, because if everyone is a journalist (37) and these privileges are granted to everyone, the mainstream journalists (39) will suffer. Informants will be able to bypass any risk of reprisal by publishing through a friend who has a blog and a political axe to grind (40), rather than a conventional reporter, who may diverge him in (39). On the one hand (43), he claims information from informants assist reporters to uncover crime and misconduct (44), and if the journalists had to disclose the names of their informants, the source of information would disappear. On the other hand (45), however, he claims that some information is rightly made legal (46). The best sol ution (47) to this paradox, according to Volokh, may be to adopt the alike laws